Assessing the Environmental Impact of the Self-propelled Bulk Carriage through LCA

  • Miro Hegedić University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture
  • Nedeljko Štefanić University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture
  • Mladen Nikšić University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences
Keywords: self-propelled bulk carriage, life cycle assessment, freight rolling stock

Abstract

Environmental sustainability of the transport sector is a highly important issue today. The European Commission has made a goal of delivering a minimum 60% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from transport by 2050. Part of this reduction will come from the railway sector by making the maintenance processes more environmentally friendly. This paper presents the results of the environmental assessment of the self-propelled bulk carriage (SPBC), an innovative new product aiming to decrease the environmental impact of the railway maintenance processes. The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was used in the study, and environmental impact is given in five impact categories based on the CML 2001 method through three main modules of the self-propelled bulk carriage life cycle: upstream, core, and downstream. The novelty of the research includes the fact that this is the first life cycle assessment study done for the bulk carriage, as well in that the authors have proposed the use of a new functional unit in the category of freight railway vehicles. The biggest environmental impact of the self-propelled bulk carriage across all five categories is in the use and maintenance phase of its life cycle and mainly due to diesel fuel use. The SPBC uses significantly less fuel than a conventional diesel locomotive.

Author Biographies

Miro Hegedić, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture
Department of Industrial Engineering, Teaching assistant
Nedeljko Štefanić, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture
Department of Industrial Engineering, Head of the Department
Mladen Nikšić, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences
Department of Railway Transport, Head of the Chair of Railway Transport Engineering

References

[1] European Commission. White Paper – Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system. Directorate - General for Mobility and Transport; 2011.
[2] European Environmental Agency. EEA SIGNALS 2016: Towards clean and smart mobility – Transport and environment in Europe. Copenhagen; 2016.
[3] European Union. EU transport in figures 2016. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg; 2016.
[4] Klöpffer W (ed.). Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014.
[5] Egbue O, Wang E, Eseonu C. A Lean Life Cycle Framework for Assessing Product Sustainability. Proceedings of the 2014 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference; 2014. p. 2069-2074.
[6] Merchan A, Belboom S, Léonard A. Environmental impact assessment of rail freight intermodality. Current issues in transportation research – Proceedings of the BIVEC/GIBET transport research days 2015; 2015. p. 77-85.
[7] Duan H, Hu M, Zhang Y, Wang J, Jiang W, Huang Q, Li J. Quantification of carbon emissions of the transport service sector in China by using streamlined life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;95: 109-116.
[8] Von Rozycki C, Koeser H, Schwarz H. Ecology profile of the German high-speed rail passenger transport system, ICE. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2003;8(2): 83-91.
[9] Stripple H, Uppenberg S. Life cycle assessment of railways and rail transports – Application in environmental product declarations (EPDs) for the Bothnia Line. Gothenburg, Sweden: Swedish Environmental Research Institute; September 2010.
[10] Åkerman J. The role of high-speed rail in mitigating climate change – The Swedish case Europabanan from a life cycle perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2011;16(3): 208-17.
[11] Lee CK, Lee JY, Kim YK. Comparison of environmental loads with rail track systems using simplified life cycle assessment (LCA). WIT Transactions on The Built Environment. 2008;101: 367-72.
[12] Fries N, Hellweg S. LCA of land-based freight transportation: Facilitating practical application and including accidents in LCIA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2014;19(3): 546-57.
[13] Asplan Viak AS. New double track line Oslo-Ski life cycle assessment of the follow line-infrastructure. Norwegian National Rail Administration; 2011.
[14] Banar M, Özdemir A. An evaluation of railway passenger transport in Turkey using life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2015;41: 88-105.
[15] Chang B, Kendall A. Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of infrastructure construction for California’s high-speed rail system. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2011;16(6): 429-34.
[16] Del Pero F. Delogu M, Pierini M, Bonaffini D. Life Cycle Assessment of a heavy metro train. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;87: 787-99.
[17] Jones H, Moura F, Domingos T. Life cycle assessment of high-speed rail: a case study in Portugal. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2017;22(3): 410-422.
[18] Ingwersen WW, Stevenson MJ. Can we compare the environmental performance of this product to that one? An update on the development of product category rules and future challenges toward alignment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2012;24: 102-8.
[19] EPD. Product Category Rules According to ISO 14025:2006. Product Group: UN CPC 495 – Rolling Stock, 2009:05 – Version 2.11; 2014.
[20] ISO 14025:2006. Environmental labels and declarations – Type III environmental declarations – Principles and procedures. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organisation (ISO); 2006.
[21] ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organisation (ISO); 2006.
[22] ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organisation (ISO); 2006.
[23] Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. General guide for Life Cycle Assessment – Provisions and Action Steps. Luxemburg: European Commission - Publications Office; 2010.
[24] Hauschild MZ, Jeswiet J, Alting L. From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspectives. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. 2005;54(2): 535-554.
[25] Guinée JB. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
Published
2018-06-26
How to Cite
1.
Hegedić M, Štefanić N, Nikšić M. Assessing the Environmental Impact of the Self-propelled Bulk Carriage through LCA. Promet - Traffic & Transportation [Internet]. 26Jun.2018 [cited 19Jul.2018];30(3):257-66. Available from: http://www.fpz.unizg.hr/traffic/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/2445
Section
Articles